High-Cost Deposit Mobilization Is Not a Sustainable Strategy

Advertisements

  • March 22, 2025

The end of the year and the beginning of a new one often mark times of intense competition within the banking sector, especially among smaller and medium-sized banks. In an effort to attract deposits right from the outset of the year, many of these banks have embarked on a high-yield deposit campaign. Customers may discover attractive deals that promise not just minimal bonuses but significant returns. For instance, short-term deposit products, particularly those with a seven-day maturity, have seen promotional interest rates effectively reaching up to 7%, drawing considerable attention from savers who are eager to maximize their returns.

Raising interest rates has emerged as a pivotal strategy for some of these smaller financial institutions in their quest for deposits. As 2024 rolled in, major state-owned banks began slashing their deposit rates, prompting smaller banks to follow suit. Some are seeing decreases in deposit rates between 10 to 50 basis points, with certain banks reducing even further. However, against this backdrop of falling rates, a number of smaller banks have chosen to buck the trend, raising their rates to attract deposits. What underlying motivations drive this counter-cyclical approach?

In contrast to larger banks, smaller institutions typically grapple with a more limited pool of funding sources and have to work hard to reach a wide array of clients. For these smaller banks, deposits are a crucial lifeline for scaling operations. Competing amongst themselves and also against larger banks means that smaller institutions have to be adept at attracting savers who are particularly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. Gaining a larger deposit base directly impacts their capacity to lend, facilitating a more sustainable stream of financing for their lending activities. Thus, in a bid to build a more substantial deposit base, small banks are increasingly likely to offer higher rates as an immediate solution to enhance their liquidity.

From a regulatory perspective, metrics such as loan-to-deposit ratios and the quality of assets on their balance sheets have introduced a layer of scrutiny that smaller banks find difficult to navigate. As these banks prepare for end-of-year evaluations, the drive to compete through interest rate adjustments becomes an unavoidable battle. By increasing rates to attract deposits, some smaller banks can address their funding shortages while also aligning better with performance metrics. This may appear beneficial at first glance; however, the broader banking sector faces rising costs of liability due to this strategy, which undermines the traditional pro-saving behavior. Alarmingly, certain institutions have resorted to dubious practices such as covertly manipulating interest rates or using secretive promotional coupons that violate regulatory guidelines. Such actions not only threaten the security of their deposits but also expose them to severe penalties from regulatory bodies.

Currently, while many smaller banks maintain relatively stable operations and have improved their capital strength, they face a persistent challenge regarding their net interest margins. By the third quarter of 2024, the net interest margin for commercial banks had already plummeted to a historical low of 1.53%. In light of this scenario, the overreliance on elevating interest rates as a strategy for attracting deposits does not seem to offer a sustainable solution for the future.

Small and medium-sized banks play a crucial role in regional economies, supporting local development and broader initiatives such as rural revitalization. Rather than exhausting all efforts to draw in deposits using high rates, these banks should swiftly look to carve out their distinct development paths that align with their capabilities. There is a pressing need to transition from merely pursuing scale to achieving quality in management and operations. Enhancements could be geared towards key areas such as capital adequacy ratios, provisions coverage, and effective risk management—the foundations of robust core banking practices.

In the current landscape of the financial industry, which is focused on generating substantial growth in five critical areas, small banks face both fresh opportunities and challenges. Consequently, they must pioneer competitive strategies that prominently differentiate them from larger banks to solidify their foothold in an intensely competitive market while aiming for sustainable, long-term growth.

When it comes to asset-liability management, it is a pivotal process for the operational phase of smaller banks that needs substantial optimization across various critical aspects. In terms of differentiated pricing on deposits, smaller banks should refrain from mere imitation of larger banks' pricing strategies. Instead, they ought to craft deposit pricing schemes tailored to their unique business attributes, service areas, and targeted customer demographics. For example, local small and micro enterprises could benefit from flexible deposit products that align with the rhythms of their cash flow and business cycles, hence addressing their yield expectations while ensuring stable bank deposits. Community banks could design personalized deposit packages targeting different age demographics and income levels to attract customers and encourage them to deposit their idle funds.

Additionally, it is vital for smaller banks to diversify their funding sources. They should not merely rely on traditional deposit-taking methods; rather, exploring multiple financing avenues is essential. One approach would be to strengthen partnerships with various financial institutions, participating in the interbank lending market, and developing asset securitization initiatives to enrich their funding sources and optimize their financial structures. For instance, repackaging high-quality loan assets to securitize and introduce them to the capital market can attract a broader base of investment, thereby replenishing funds for expanding operations. Furthermore, it would also be beneficial to pursue policy-level support by getting involved in local special bond issuances, leveraging governmental backing to widen their funding channels and reinforce their financial prowess.

Moreover, bolstering internal governance is fundamental for small banks aspiring for high-quality development. They must establish robust decision-making mechanisms, ensuring that all business decisions undergo thorough market research and risk assessments to mitigate impulsive strategies and the associated risks. It's also crucial to enhance their internal risk management systems, conducting comprehensive and dynamic monitoring of various risks, including credit, market, and liquidity risks to guarantee operational stability and safety. Along with this, optimizing human resource management is key to attracting and retaining finance professionals, cultivating a capable and innovative workforce that drives ongoing development within the bank.

Furthermore, smaller banks must strike a balance between attracting low-cost deposits and enhancing customer appeal. They cannot fall into the trap of aggressively competing on pricing alone. While it may draw some customers in the short term, fluctuating interest rates may not construct a stable or loyal customer base over time. Thus, moving forward organic strategies that include outstanding service delivery, innovative financial products, and an optimized customer experience is essential. This comprehensive enhancement of competitiveness promises a path toward sustainable, vibrant development that fits the unique attributes of smaller banks.

Comments (121 Comments)

Leave A Comment